Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Utopia can be achieved with 100% taxation.

Or at least that is what the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives would have us believe.

To put it as simply as I can, this study is 100% BS!

Off the top of my head I would like them to explain to me just how a tax cut automatically equals a service cut? It doesn't and if something this simple is wrong it does not say much for the rest of the study.

Does anyone else find it strange that this comes 1 day after Ignatieff stated that he would raise taxes? Update: Iggy has backtracked away from that statement.

Add your thoughts to the comments.


Anonymous said...

More socialists getting free air time from the MSM.

Jen said...

Schreiber's little red book says PAUL MARTIN, JEAN CHRETIEN, CHAREST and a couple others recieved $30-50 thousand each.

kursk said...

That centre for policy alternatives pulls to the left harder than my old Vauxhall Victor with a bad alignment job..

I would imagine that anything short of 5 year plans for the proletariat would be considered regressive by these jr. Marxists..

Anonymous said...

old white guy says if i tie you to a post in sask in jan will global warming keep you from freezing to death?

Ardvark said...

Gayle, one of the local spin and distraction Liberal bloggers, apparently believes that this study is not biased.

The entire premise of this thing is biased since it makes the assumption that the government is capable of running anything better or more efficiently than the public sector. It also presumes to tell me what is good for myself over asking me what I think is good for myself.

Bias, what bias?