Thursday, February 16, 2012

Nasitness from the Alberta PC's and why we can expect much more in the days to come.

Like a cornered animal lashing out attacking anything that comes near them, the Alberta PC's seem to have taken the same approach towards anyone who dare criticizes them. And they are doing so for exactly the same reason, fear.

The AUMA kerfuffle, which you can read about here, is probably the most famous recent example of lashing out at criticism and detractors. First the Minister sends off a letter to Linda Sloan, which he cc'ed to all government members, all AUMA Board members, and all AUMA member municipalities, saying that because of the criticisms Sloan made of the government that no member of Cabinet or the PC caucus would attend the AUMA breakfast. Making the matter much worse however was the Premiers Chief of Staff, Stephen Carter's tweet: "Let's be clear, Linda Sloan didn't just criticize the budget, she lied. Maliciously. #ableg #AUMA"  where he not only called Sloan a liar but that she did so 'maliciously'. The tweet was happily re-tweeted by many and others took to twitter to also say that Sloan should apologize.  The premier has since had Carter apologize to Sloan and made Minister Griffiths play nice and go to the AUMA breakfast meeting, even though she has stated: "I firmly stand behind the minister’s comments," the pattern is clear.

While the most famous example, it certainly is not the only one that we have seen this week from the Government, staffers, or closely tied PC supporters.

Alberta Liberal leader Raj Sherman criticized for doing shifts as a medical doctor in the emergency department: "While we're talking about top ups, aren't you topping up your own salary by moonlighting in the ER?" and accused of being on twitter while he should be looking after patients: "... he was thinking about me while dealing w people's medical emergencies? or was someone else tweeting 4 him? #ableg #insafehands"
   
From just this morning Jessica Jacobs-Mino, a "communications officer", felt the need to attack Calgary Herald columnist Don Braid for his latest column highlighting political games in municipal funding. Here is some of what she tweeted (on taxpayer time?) : "@DonBraid should do his research. There's much more to the Isley story, and lots of history there."  and  "@DonBraid you're the almighty, all-knowing pundit. Do your job, expert-on-all-things-Alberta." and this gem "@DonBraid lol. cute. Taking the high road, I see. Guess you know a thing or 2 about bullying after all....

Note: I would provide links to the above tweets but they were deleted shortly after being posted and later the entire account was deleted. But having seen this game before, from the PC campaign manager, I took a screenshot just in case.



Don't like the latest poll numbers, then claim the poll is: "questionable push poll printed as legit in a major daily" without of course any proof whatsoever


There are many more examples but I think think you get the idea. I would be remiss if I didn't mention that, as far as I am aware, everyone of those tweets that I quoted came from someone who recently attended the PCAA "campaign college" where as we can see they appear to have taken full advantage of the social media seminars that took place. (sarc off)


I suspect that this is only the beginning and that as PC poll numbers go down and people start paying attention to the mess the PC's and their government actually are, that these types of attacks will only intensify as they feel pushed more and more into a corner. Not a good thing for a party whose favorite spin consists of calling people who criticize the government as being "angry", but than again understanding irony has never been much a PC strong suit. They are scared and we can expect to see much more of this in the coming weeks.

8 comments:

rl said...

In particular, I love the "angry" tag they love to throw around. Like George Washington wasn't angry at the British, or MLK wasn't angry at segregation. People take action because they're not satisfied with the status quo!
I think the PC establishment is angry that the WRP is the RED PILL for Albertans and is waking the populace from the political laziness the PC's have fostered!

Calgary Junkie said...

The Calgary Herald editorialist and Don Braid aren't cutting Redford much slack. Unlike the Edmonton Journal, although their provincial affairs columnist Graham Thompson is a lot like Braid.

So anyway, this is another Calgary/Edmonton divide, that probably frustrates and worries the PCs. They certainly can't take Calgary for granted, as we saw in their by-election loss to Wildrose's Paul Hinman, in Ralph Klein's old riding. Meanwhile, the Dippers are sure to give them a good fight in Edmonton.

Obviously, the PC Party has become less and less recognizable. Redman isn't even bothering to point to Ted Morton as an example of the fiscal conservatism in her Cabinet. Ted has sold himself out, and morphed into who-knows-what.

I'd be worried if I were them. They are heading into unchartered waters, with a leader that only ONE of their MLAs endorsed, who gamed their ridiculous voting system, and was essentially foisted on them by many visitors to the Party.

Ardvark said...

For the record: I was just accused of stealing the screen shot used above of the missing tweets from Colby Cosh.

Wrong.

I took my own shot and in fact still have the now deleted page still open in my browser in all its pre-edited glory.

If I would have borrowed the screenshot I would have given proper credit.

wilson said...

Makes yah wonder what the PCs learned in campaign school, eh.

Day after day, REDford and her Ministers refuse to answer the 'will you raise taxes or create new taxes within the next 4 years' question.

Reminds me of Ignatieff refusing to answer the coalition of losers question.

Ardvark said...

They are in trouble and the writ has not even been dropped yet.

It is going to get ugly before it is over.

Powell Lucas said...

I have a question pertinent to the lies the PCs seem to throw around like grass seed and I wonder if anyone else heard what I did today? On the CTV Edmonton 6:00 o'clock news i caught part of a story that was reporting that the proposed budget deficit numbers do not include capital expenditures. If this is correct, the PCs are trying to pull a smoke and mirrors accounting trick and the deficit will be in the 3.1 billion range, not the less than 1 billion this gang of thugs is reporting. Did anyone else catch this story?

Blame Crash said...

The PC's are in a serious downward spiral that is gaining momentum.
The more it becomes apparent that they are a wounded predator, the more buzzards they’ll see circling overhead which always brings in even more circling buzzards which then attracts all manner of hungry creatures smelling a good old fashioned feeding frenzy.
Dinner’s on!

Anonymous said...

They got away with their shit for 41 years but thanks to blogs like this those days are over